Reasoning
Topic: Statement, Assumption & Conclusion
Study Material
Concept 1: What is reasoning?
Examples:
Concept 2: What is critical thinking?
Examples of critical thinking:
backgrounds to your own.
Concept 3: What is Statement and assumptions?
Concept 4: Examples on statements and assumptions:
Assumption: Mother is above all materialistic pleasures of life. This assumption is valid as without assuming it, Shashi Kapoor wouldn’t have concluded what he said.
Assumption: The mother warns her child with the expectation that after warning, the child may stop troubling her.
Assumption-1: “People can spend any amount of money to buy sweets made from pure ingredients”. Now this assumption is invalid because the owner of the sweet shop may have thought about the money factor associated with the sweets, but the assumption cannot be accepted as it is not mentioned in the statement. Any assumption can be accepted if it is:
Assumption-2: “People want sweets made from pure ingredients”. This assumption is the root cause of the statement. People want sweets made from pure ingredients, that is why banner was put up. Thus, this is a valid statement. Assumption-3: “The owner of the shop expected that people would get attracted from the banner and his sales would increase”. This is a valid assumption because that is the desired effect of the statement.
Assumption-1: Eradicating corruption is the only solution for country’s overall development. Assumption-2: Eradicating corruption is the best solution for country’s overall development. Assumption-3: Eradicating corruption is the definite solution for country’s overall development. Assumption-4: Eradicating corruption would probably help in overall development. In 1,2,3 the words only, best, definite are extreme words with no proof from statement. Whereas “probably” is acceptable in context of the statement. Important Notes:
Important points to remember:
Concept 5: What is statement and conclusion?
Concept 6- Examples on statement and conclusion:
Conclusion: 1. The sale of television sets of other companies has decreased 2. The sale of television sets of company X was nil in the past Explanation: In the given statement, nothing is given about the sale of television sets of other companies. Hence, conclusion 1 is not valid while the second conclusion is not related to the statement. Hence, it is also not a valid conclusion.
Conclusion: 1. The company X thinks that an engineer is a good worker. 2. The company X is in need of engineers. Explanation: Both the conclusion are valid because the company thinks that an engineer is a good worker and also they are in need of engineers, because it is given in advertisement. Important points to remember:
|
PROBLEMS ON STATEMENT, ASSUMPTION AND CONCLUSION FOUNDATION Directions to solve: In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer:
MODERATE
In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answer
HOTS- HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answer
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer:
SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION 1. Answer: Option D Explanation: According to the statement, 80% of the total runs were made by spinners. So, I does not follow. Nothing about the opening batsmen is mentioned in the statement. So, II also does not follow. 2. Answer: Option A Explanation: Clearly, I directly follows from the given statement. Also, it is mentioned that old ideas are replaced by new ones, as thinking changes with the progressing time. So, II does not follow. 3. Answer: Option E Explanation: According to the statement, Government has spoiled financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors. This means that only those persons should be appointed as Directors who are experts in finance and are acquainted with the financial work of the institute. So, both I and II follow. 4. Answer: Option B Explanation: The fact given in I is quite contrary to the given statement. So, I does not follow. II mentions the direct implications of the state discussed in the statement. Thus, II follows. 5. Answer: Option D Explanation: The statement concentrates on the increasing viewership of TV. and does not stress either on increasing the readership of newspapers or making studies regarding the same. So, neither I nor II follows. MODERATE 1. Answer: Option E Explanation: The performance of the individual has to be tested over a span of time as the statement mentions. So, I is implicit. The statement mentions that the individual’s worth shall be reviewed (during probation period) before confirmation. So, II is also implicit. 2. Answer: Option A Explanation: Since the statement talks of putting the child in school at the age of 5, it means that the child is mentally prepared for the same at this age. So, I is implicit. But nothing about admission after 6 years of age is mentioned in the statement. So, II is not implicit.
3. Answer: Option B Explanation: Assumption I goes against the statement. So, it is not implicit. The allowance will serve as a reward to the employees and shall provoke them to come on time. So, II is implicit.
4. Answer: Option A Explanation: I directly follows from the statement and so is implicit. Also, the statement is a suggestion and does not tell about a government policy or its position of funds. So, II is not implicit.
5. Answer: Option A Explanation: Such decisions as given in the statement are taken only after taking the existing vacancies into consideration. So, I implicit while II isn’t. HOTS-HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1. Answer: Option B Explanation: Clearly, nothing is mentioned about the professional nature of the job. So, I is not implicit. The statement hints that one rejects a thing that is easy to achieve. So, II is implicit.
2. Answer: Option A Explanation: The statement mentions that concessions should not be given to people who can afford to spend holidays in hill stations. This means they should be given only to needy persons. So, I is implicit. But, II does not follow from the statement and is not implicit.
3. Answer: Option B Explanation: Clearly, the statement expresses grave concern over a newly-built flyover not being utilized by public. This implies that such projects need to be taken up only after working out their utility and that the huge expenditure incurred on building such structures is worthwhile only if they prove useful for the public. Thus, only II is implicit.
4. Answer: Option D Explanation: The statement neither propagates the diet of any of the countries nor compares the two types of cancer. So, neither I nor II follows.
5. Answer: Option D Explanation: Nothing about the details of the employees’ income or the cause of their refusal to declare their income and assets, can be deduced from the given statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
|